Entrepreneurial Intention of Researchers at the State Polytechnic University of Carchi
Abstract
Problem Statement. This study addresses a critical gap in the Ecuadorian science and technology system: the weak connection between research activities carried out at universities and the effective generation of knowledge-based businesses. In particular, it aimed to diagnose the level of entrepreneurial intention among active research staff at the State Polytechnic University of Carchi (UPEC) between 2015 and 2020. Objective. This research aims to determine the entrepreneurial intentions of researchers at the State Polytechnic University of Carchi (UPEC) who conducted research activities between 2015 and 2020. Materials and Methods. Entrepreneurial intention was measured from three perspectives: scientific profile, demographic profile, and entrepreneurial profile. To achieve this objective, a 93-item questionnaire, validated by experts in the field, was developed and administered to a sample of 30 individuals, including research professors, administrators, and authorities of the Higher Education Institution. The sampling method used was purposive and non-probabilistic. Results. Among the main findings, a medium level (57.74 out of 100) in the entrepreneurial intention of UPEC researchers stands out. The profile that contributed most to this result was the entrepreneurial profile (66%), followed by the scientific profile (47%). Discussion. Although there is great entrepreneurial and scientific potential among researchers, their capacity to initiate and manage ventures needs improvement to enhance the quality and impact of research results. Conclusions. Finally, generating institutional support, spaces, and incentives is key, as is strengthening support networks alliances with the productive, public, and private sectors, and a leading role for academia in shaping the regional entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem. Contribution/Originality. There is very little research on entrepreneurial intention applied to university researchers in Ecuador. We hope to contribute to this knowledge base, motivate innovation and technology transfer, and foster the development of science- and technology based ventures in Ecuadorian higher education institutions.
Keywords
Categories
Similar Articles
-
Proposal for an Entrepreneur Tool in the Design of a Business Model
Luis Alejandro Gazca Herrera, José Rafael Gómez Cabañas, Jessica Garizurieta Bernabe, Fredy Castro Naranjo
-
Entrepreneurial failure, as a learning experience for entrepreneurs in the Municipality of Puebla, México
Amado Torralba Flores, Alfredo Pérez Paredes, Dulce María Martínez Ángeles
-
Generating elements of business success in young university entrepreneurs in Colombia
Amado Torralba Flores, Irma Nayeli Martínez Hernández, Ana Elena Mugno Noriega, Alfredo Pérez Paredes
-
Factors related to the creation of economic entrepreneurship in the young population of Medellín 2016 -2021
Santiago Gómez Velásquez, Santiago Bedoya Moncada , Diana Carolina Usuga Pineda, Johnatan Andrés Soto Aguirre
-
Creativity and entrepreneurship as the foundation of the orange economy in the curricular analysis of the Architecture program of the Universidad La Gran Colombia
Germán Andrés Alarcón-Leudo, José Jímenez-Londoño
-
Edu- Entertainment and Marketing of Experience with children as a strategy for the dissemination of Science and Technology
Alejandra Vega, Danae Duana Avila
-
Communication as a strategy for competitive differentiation
Yosselin Zevallos Oscco, Juan Alberto Collado Vargas, Pedro Leonardo Tito Huamani
-
Eco Innovation and technology in the Energy Sector in the Dominican Republic
Ricardo Joel Almánzar Fortuna
-
Epistemological findings in management research applying immanient critique, from humanism to the humanistic curriculum
Camilo Osejo-Bucheli
-
Proposals for strengthen the Enterprising Culture in the municipalities of Puebla and Tlaxcala
Alfredo Pérez Paredes, Amado Torralba Flores, José Aurelio Cruz de los Ángeles
Authors
References
Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Azoulay, P., Jones, B. F., Kim, J. D., & Miranda, J. (2018). Age and High-Growth Entrepreneurship (Working Paper No. 24489). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24489
Cunningham JA. (2022). COVID-19: Entrepreneurial Universities and Academic Entrepreneurship. In: Audretsch, D.B., Kunadt, I.A.M, ed. The COVID-19 Crisis and Entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham, 2022, pp.209-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04655-1_15
Duval-Couetil, N; Wang, Yi; Epstein, A. (2025). Bridging the intention-behavior gap in academic entrepreneurship: the impact of training on faculty and graduate student researchers. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 32(8), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2024-0184
Guindalini, C; Verreynne, M; Kastelle, T. (2021). Scientific inventions to market: Mapping the academic entrepreneurship ecosystem, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173. https://cnica Estatal del Carchi doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521005771
Ismail, K.; Anuar M,; Omar W. et al. (2015). Entrepreneurial Intention, Entrepreneurial Orientation of Faculty and Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.897
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M.D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15,411-432.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions. citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. Int Entrep Manag J, 11, 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5
Martins, J. M.; Shahzad, M. F., y Xu, S. (2023). Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures. J Innov Entrep, 12(63). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00333-9
Mejía, J. (2012). Modelo de creación de empresas de tecnología, basadas en el perfil del científico-emprendedor. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. https://tesis.ipn.mx/handle/123456789/11842
Obschonka, M., Moeller, J., & Goethner, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial passion and personality: The case of academic entrepreneurship. Front Psychol, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02697
Perkmann, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature. Research Policy, 42(2), 23-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
Quinde, J., Peña, S. (2022) Intención emprendedora para los investigadores de la Universidad de Cuenca. [Tesis de grado en Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad de Cuenca]. http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/handle/123456789/39463
Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Referencia histórica de investigación sobre emprendimiento de la Academia de Liderazgo Empresarial de la Universidad de Illinois en Urbana-Champaign. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1497759
Tarapuez-Chamorro, E; Álvarez-Rodríguez, C; Hidalgo-Villota, ME. (2022). Actitudes e intención emprendedora en docentes investigadores en Colombia. Revista EAN, (93). https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n93.2022.3715
Yu, Z.; Lu, K. (2023). What motivates academics toward entrepreneurship? Front Psychol, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1073866
OECD/CAF/UN ECLAC/Development Bank of Latin America (2024). SME Policy Index: Latin America
and the Caribbean 2024 – Country Profile: Ecuador. https://www.oecd.org/es/publications/indice-de-politicas-para-pymes-america-latina-y-el-caribe-2024_807e9eaf-es.html
StartupBlink (2025). Ecuador Startup Ecosystem - Rankings, Startups, and Insights. https://lp.startupblink.com/report/