Land use and its influence on soil compaction in eastern Colombia.
Appearance
Color mode
Language
EN English
Navigation
In this work, the impact of different uses on soil compaction is evaluated, for which the current and current means uses in the area of Puerto Lleras-Meta-Colombia are studied: silvopastoral system (SPP), monoculture (MON), pasture (PS) and secondary forest (SF), a composite sample of 5 points at 20 cm of depth was redirected for each system, we used an experimental design absolutely randomly DIA, because the physical-chemical analyzes of the soil were analyzed under controlled laboratory conditions. The variables that were evaluated were: Organic matter (Walkley and Black), pH (potentiometric), Apparent density, Gravimetric humidity, Volumetric humidity, Real density, Porosity, Water sheet, Volumetric humidity at field capacity, Macroporosity, Resistance to Penetration and texture. To assess the resistance to penetration of each of the systems, the penetrator has also been used. The statistical analysis was carried out by means of the analysis of variance (P<0.01) and the differences between the treatments were analyzed by the Tukey test (P<0.05). The data were run in the Infostat statistical package. The results indicate that the SF, SPS, PS and MON do not present problems of compaction, means by the apparent presence and the resistance to the penetration, the systems of predominance of the sandy ones and therefore are less susceptible to this problem, the system However, there was not a problem of compaction that tends to a macroporosity (M) close to 10% (14.08%). The SPS presented a total ideal, and the FS is a highly water retaining system.
Alakukku, L.; Weisskopf, P.; Chamen, W.C.T.; Tijink, F.G.J.; Van Der Linden, J.P.; Pires, S.; Sommerf, C.; Spoor, G. 2003. Prevention strategies for field traffic induced subsoil compaction: A review Part 1. Machine/ soil interactions. Soil Till. Res., V: 73: 145-160. Disponible: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000093&pid=S0100-6916200900030001000001&lng=en
Andrade, P.; Upadhyaya S; Plouffe C; Poutre B. 2008. Development and field evaluation of a field-ready soil compaction profile sensor for real-time applications, Appl. Eng. Agric., 24 (6): 743-750.
Batey T, McKenzie D.C. 2006. Soil compaction: identification directly in the field. Soil Use and Management, 22 (2): 123-131. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227794719_Soil_compaction_Identification_directly_in_the_field
Bertol, I.; Schick, J.; Massariol, J, Reis, E.; Dily, l. 2000. Propriedades físicas de um cambissolo húmico álico afetadas pelo manejo do solo. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, 30: 91-95.
Blainski, E, Fidalski J, Tormenta C y Muylaert R. 2008. Quantificação da degradação física do solo por meio da curva de resistência do solo à penetração. Revista Brasileira Ciência do Solo, 32: 975-983. Disponible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250033965_Quantificacao_da_degradacao_fisica_do_solo_por_meio_da_curva_de_resistencia_do_solo_a_penetracao
Cairo P, Reyes, A, Aro, R, Robledo, L. 2017. Efecto de las coberturas en algunas propiedades del suelo. Finca La Morrocoya, Barinas, Venezuela. Pastos y Forrajes, 40 (2): 127-134.
Camargo O., Alleoni, L. 1997. Compactação do solo e o desenvolvimento das plantas. Piracicaba: ESALQ, 132 p.
Devine, S.; Markewitz, D.; Hendrix, P.; Coleman, D. 2014.Soil aggregates and associated organic matter under conventional tillage, no-tillage, and forest succession after three decades. PLosOne. 9 (1):1-12.
Di Rienzo J.A., Casanoves F., Balzarini M.G., Gonzalez L., Tablada M., Robledo C.W. InfoStat versión 2014. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
Fageria N, Baligar V. 2008. Chapter 7 Ameliorating soil acidity of tropical oxisols by liming for sustainable crop production. Advances in Agronomy, 99: 345-399.
Foloni, J., Calonego, J.; de Lima, S. 2003. Efecto de la compactación del suelo en desenvolvimiento aéreo y radical de cultivos de Brasilia. Revista Agropecuaria Brasileira, 38 (8): 947-953.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2015. Carta mundial de los suelos. 12 p. Disponible: http://www.fao.org/soils- 2015/resources/fao-publications/es/
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2016. Estado Mundial del Recurso Suelo (Resumen Técnico). Roma. 92 p. Disponible: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5126s.pdf
Glab, T. 2011. Effect of Soil Compaction on Root System Morphology and Productivity of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 20 (6): 1473-1480.
González, L, Casanoves M, Di Rienzo F, Robledo J, Carlos W. Corporativo: Grupo InfoStat, InfoStat, versión 2008. Manual del usuario. Córdoba (Argentina). P.imprenta: Editorial Brujas. 334 p.
Hakansson, I.; Voorhees, W.R.; Riley, H. 1988 Vehicle and wheel factors influencing soil compaction and crop response in different traffic regimes. Soil and Tillage Research, Amsterdam, 11: 239-282.
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC). 6ª Ed. 2006. Métodos Analíticos del Laboratorio de Suelos. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: IGAC.
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC). 2013. Guía de muestreo [en línea]. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: IGAC. Disponible en: https://www.igac.gov.co/sites/igac.gov.co/files/guiademuestreo.pdf
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC). 2014. Manejo de suelos colombianos. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: IGAC.
Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi (IGAC). 1ª Ed. 2015. Suelos y tierras de Colombia. Subdirección de Agrología. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: IGAC.
Jaramillo D. 2002. Introducción a la Ciencia del suelo. Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. 619 p. Disponible en: http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/2242/1/70060838.2002.pdf
Laureda, D, Botta, G, Tolon A, Rosatto. 2016. Compactación del suelo inducida por la maquinaria en campos de polo en Argentina. Rev. Fac. Cienc. Agrar., Univ. Nac. Cuyo [online]. 48: 1: 79-99.
Lal, R. 2015. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability. 7: 5875-5895. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/5/5875
Lima, C., Silva, A.; Imhoff, S y Leão, T. 2004. Compressibilidade de um solo sob sistemas de pastejo rotacionado intensivo irrigado e não irrigado. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo, Viçosa, 28 (6): 945-951. Disponible en: https://www.rbcsjournal.org/article/soil-compressibility-under-non-irrigated-andhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832004000600002
London JR (Ed.) 2014. Booker Tropical Soil manual and handbook for soil survey an agricultural. Land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. New York and London. 465 p. Disponible en: https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=en&lr=&id=xse2AgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=USDA.+(2014).+Soil+Survey+Manual.+Washington+DC:+USDA.&ots=zUJCsYoJP4&sig=E2vZsoa78n6TTrRbzaoM9RbnX5c#v=onepage&q=USDA.%20(2014).%20Soil%20Survey%20Manual.%20Washington%20DC%3A%20USDA.&f=false
Luciano, R, Adriano J, Da Costa A, Batistella B, Warmling M. 2012. Atributos físicos relacionados à compactação de solos sob vegetação nativa em região de altitude no Sul do Brasil. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo, Viçosa, 36 (6): 1733-1744 Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbcs/v36n6/07.pdf
Lüscher A, Mueller I, Soussana J, Rees R, Peyraud J. 2014. Potential of legume‐based grassland–livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass Forage Science, 69 (2): 206-228.
Mckenzie, R. H.; Research, S.; Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management, 2010. Alberta Agriculture and Rural. Consultado: 28/09/2018. Disponible en: http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex13331/$file/510-1.pdf?OpenElement
Medina, C. 2016. Efectos de la compactación de suelos por el pisoteo de animales, en la productividad de los suelos. remediaciones. (Nota Corta). Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim, 8 (1):88-93.
Ministerio de Trabajo de Colombia (Mintrabajo). 2013. Perfil productivo Del municipio de Puerto López. 97 p. Disponible: https://www.meta.gov.co/web/sites/default/files/ormet/2013/2.%20PERFIL%20PRODUCTIVO%20MUNICIPIO%20DE%20PUERTO%20LOPEZ.pdf
Mouazen, A., Ramos H. 2009. Expanding implementation of an on-line measurement system of topsoil compaction in loamy sand, loam, silt loam and silt soils, Soil &Tillage Research, 103: 98-104.
Moussadek, R., Mrabet, R., Dahan, A., Zouahri, M., Mourid, E., Van Ranst, E. 2014. Tillage system affects soil organic carbon storage and quality in Central Morocco. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. Article ID 654796 doi: 10.1155/2014/654796.
Mur M, Balbuena R. 2014. Compactación de un suelo argiudol típico por tráfico en un sistema de producción de forrajes. Cienc. Suelo, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, 32 (1): 1-12. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/374462
Noruega, M. A., Vélez, J. A. 2011. Evaluación de algunas propiedades físicas del suelo en diferentes usos. Nariño: Revista de ciencias Agrícolas.
Orellana G, Ortega S., Moreno, A. 2008. Fracción orgánica ligera del suelo como indicador agroecológico. Revista de Agricultura Orgánica, 2: 40-41.
Palosuo, T. 2008. Soil carbon modelling as a tool for carbon balance studies in forestry. Dissertationes Forestales 61 Department of Forest Ecology. Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry. University of Helsinki, 60 p. Disponible en: https://www.dissertationesforestales.fi/pdf/article1843.pdf
Pariz, C, Costa, C, Crusciol, A, Meirelles, P, Castilhos, A, Andreotti, M, Costa, N., Martello, J, Souza, D, Protes, V, Longhini, V y Franzluebbers, A. 2017. Production, nutrient cycling and soil compaction to grazing of grass companion cropping with corn and soybean. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 108: 35-54.
Parra A, de Figueiredo E, de Bordonal, R. et al., 2019. Greenhouse gas emissions in conversion from extensive pasture to other agricultural systems in the Andean region of Colombia. Environment Development and Sustainability 21: 249.
Pignataro Netto, I; Kato, E; Goedert, W. 2009. Atributos físicos e químicos de um latossolo Vermelho-amarelo sob pastagens com diferentes históricos de uso. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa, 3: 1441-1448.
Ralisch, R; Miranda, T; Okumura, R; Barbosa, G; Guimarães, M.; Scopel, E.; Balbino, L. 2007. Resistência a penetração de um latossolo vermelho amarelo do cerrado sob diferentes sistemas de manejo. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 12 (4): 381-384.
Rodríguez, M. 2016. Stock de carbono del suelo, a escala local, en ocho sistemas de uso agrícola del piedemonte llanero, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Escuela de Posgrados Doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias, Palmira, Colombia, 140 p. Disponible en: http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/51731/1/PhD.Maryory_mayo.pdf
Silva, G, Lima H., Campanha, M., Gilkes, R., Oliveira, T. 2011. Soil physical quality of Luvisols under agroforestry, natural vegetation and conventional crop management systems in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Geoderma, 167-168: 61-70. Disponible en: https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/46818/1/API-Soil-physical.pdf
Streck, C. A.; Reinert, D. J.; Reichert, J. M., Kaiser, D. R. 2004. Modificações em propriedades físicas com a compactação do solo causada pelo tráfego induzido de um trator em plantio direto. C. Rural, 34: 755-760.
Tavares Filho, J.; Tessier, D. 2009. Compressibility of oxisol aggregates under no-till in response to soil water potential. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 33: 1525-1533.
Valdés, A. 2010. Cómo controlan la erosión las raíces de las plantas. (Editorial), Revista de Divulgación Científica y Tecnológica de la Universidad Veracruzana, 23: 2. Disponible en: https://www.uv.mx/cienciahombre/revistae/vol23num2/articulos/erosion/.
Zerpa, G.; Sosa, O.; Berardi, J.; Bolatti, J. P.; Galindo, A., Maldonado, J. 2013.La resistencia mecánica a la penetración en pasturas. Agromensajes, 35: 64-68.
