Perception of Microentrepreneurs in the Public Sector by the National Institute of the Entrepreneur as Public Policy

10.22579/23463910.40
Published 2017-01-15
content - research articles

Abstract

The entrepreneurial phenomenon has become more important in recent years and it is therefore very important that the different orders of government of any nation, assume a responsible position before this fact, especially, when they identify what are the main characteristics and motivations they have The entrepreneurs to start a company, which allows to have an X-ray of what are the requirements for people to decide to undertake and those who have already achieved it can be maintained and able to grow and that is why public policies implemented for this purpose, charge a Greater importance, especially in those countries that are developing, such as Mexico.

     This allows us to reflect the relevance of the fact that entrepreneurs who have identified a good investment idea and already established entrepreneurs require regular support of a financial type that allows them to generate conditions of competitiveness and adaptation to new environments Economic and social, that cause that the entrepreneurs have to be more innovative and creative.

     For this reason, the present research seeks to analyze how entrepreneurs perceive all micro and small size in the municipality of Puebla in Mexico, one of the public policies implemented by the current Federal Government called INADEM (National Institute of Entrepreneurs) That two of the objectives established by this Institute are: a) To promote a legal and regulatory environment conducive to the development of Entrepreneurs and MSMEs; B) Promote access to finance and capital for entrepreneurs and MSMEs.

Keywords

Categories

Authors

References

Bartelsman, Eric, John C. Haltiwanger, and Stefano Scarpetta (2004). “Microeconomic Evidence of Creative Destruction in Industrial and Developing Countries.” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series: 3464.

Castro Fernández Valvanera (2011). Innovación y el espíritu Emprendedor. España: Escuela de Organización Industrial.

Chandler, Jack y Plano, Ralph (1998). Public Administration Dictionary. Santa Barbara: Editorial ABC Clio.

Gómez A., Ruben, Gestión de Políticas Públicas: Aspectos Operativos, Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, No.2, Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia, 223-236.

González Uribe Héctor (2007).Teoría Política. México: Editorial Porrúa.

Leiva Bonilla Juan Carlos (s/f). Los emprendedores y la creación de empresas, Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica.

May, Peter J. (2003). “Policy design and implementation”. En B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration, London, pp. 223-233.

Peters, B. Guy (2015). American Public Policy. Estados Unidos: SAGE Publications.

Santibáñez H, A., Barra R., M., & Ortiz M., P (s.f.). La Racionalidad de los actores en políticas públicas: Un esquema teórico para entender el funcionamiento de las democracias modernas. Recuperado el 6 de junio de 2016, de http://www.colpos.mx/tabasco/diplomado/3y4demarzo/actores_en_politica.pdf

Secretaria de Economía (2015). Diagnostico 2014 del Programa Fondo Nacional Emprendedor S020. México: INAEM.

Sistema Económico Latinoamericano y del Caribe (SELA) (2015). Políticas Públicas de apoyo a las MIPYMES en América Latina y el Caribe. Caracas, Venezuela: Secretaría Permanente del SELA.

Subdere (2002). Diccionario de Administración Pública Chilena. Santiago de Chile: Editorial LOM.

Subdere, O. H., & Morales, M (2009). Guía Metodológica para la Formulación de Políticas Públicas Regionales. Santiago de Chile: Subsecretaria de Desarrollo Regional y Administrativo.

Statistics

Abstract
0
PDF accesses
0

Dimensions

PlumX

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>